Bench and Bar of Old Lee County Illinois
It is with emotions of pleasure I take
my typewriter in hand to begin the story of the legal fraternity
of Lee County.
Nearly all of my young life was spent,
as deputy circuit clerk, in dose touch with the lawyers of Lee
County. And what a glorious flood of recollections sweeps over
me the moment I try to select the first one to mention! They
almost kill themselves in the stampede to find expression first.
Lee County always has had a strong bar.
From Edward Southwick, the first lawyer, down to the present
moment, the lawyers of Lee have been known all over the state as
men of great ability.
The lawyers of Lee have been a fearless
lot of men too. How well do I remember the day the late Bernard
H. Trusdell made a speech to a jury which was one of the most
remarkable on record.
A certain community which he represented
had been over ridden by a lawless lot of hoodlums. They had
terrorized the community until quiet, law abiding citizens
became desperate and they called upon Bernard H. Trusdell to
bring the culprits to justice. Mr. Trusdell secured the
indictment of certain members of the gang who had been
especially vicious and Mr. Trusdell followed the case into
association with the states attorney to give the prosecution the
benefit of his legal mind as well as the benefits of his
personal feelings in the case.
When he came to conclude the arguments
for the prosecution, did he appeal to those jurors to do their
duty? Did he approach those twelve men in meekness, begging them
to bestow a favor on the community? Did his words indicate that
small favors might be accepted from that jury by way of
compromise in case of a possible disagreement? Never! In
conclusion, he raised a clenched fist; his eyes were aflame with
indignation at the lawlessness of the defendants and he told
that jury something like this: "The members of this community
were presented with two ways to treat this ease. One was a
prosecution in court; the other was to administer the law
themselves. They have chosen the former and now we expect you to
do your duty as jurors. If you don't then I'll be one to
shoulder a musket and with others, to settle it the other way."
That jury gave the defendants the limit
and never more was that community molested by that or any other
gang of law breakers.
And what red letter days were those when
Mr. B. H. Trusdell locked horns with his brother, Abram K.
Trusdell, today the patriarch of Lee County's lawyers!
Brilliant, profound, fearless, tactful, forceful, by the time
these two giants had finished their case, nothing had been
overlooked; not a single question of fact; not a line of law had
been forgotten. They gave and took. Sometimes they rested on the
verdict, but more often, the case was followed until the court
of last resort had declared for one or the other.
I have heard the old prosecutor,
McCartney, of Sterling, say that when the Messrs. Trusdell were
arrayed on opposite sides of a case, that that case was the best
tried case he ever had heard and for one, he derived great
profit in listening to the trial.
I dwell upon the names of these two
gentlemen, not because they were so gentle and kind to me, who
as a boy was charged with responsibilities which if neglected,
would rightly subject me to severe criticisms, but because they
were grand lawyers.
How many times have I seen them peep
over my shoulder in a pleasant, friendly way, to see if my
summonses and writs were issued correctly! Not in a critical,
pretentious, pedantic sort of way to rattle me and then open on
me with a battery of verbal artillery they knew so well how to
level at an opponent, but as friends. The older, Mr. B. H., was
a man of magnificent physique; of commanding appearance and yet
with me, his gentle ways always were suggestive, accompanied
with his laying his arm lightly across my shoulders; he never
was impatient with me. And for the other, Mr. Abram K., what
cannot I say? My preceptor! How faith-fully he tutored me! How
pleasantly he corrected my atrocious answers to hypothetical
questions! How patiently too he guided my hand through the
intricacies of instructions and other documents! And then there
came the day when I must go to Ottawa for the bar examination!
With the same fatherly interest, although pressed for time, he
left business to go with me to Ottawa and dress up my courage at
critical times. And all for me, a boy of trifling abilities,
heedless, inappreciative and slovenly. And too, he never
credited that important trip as one designed for my benefit. The
rather, he made the remark casually that he too must go to
Ottawa to make some motions. It is true he made many motions
before the Supreme Court on that momentous day, but the trip was
made for my benefit; to see me through and he never left my
presence until the ordeal was passed and we had returned home.
Those were the men who made the Lee
County bar famous. Such men gave it a name that must remain
imperishable. Men afraid of no odds in a legal controversy, and
yet in the midst of a battle who could say to a little boy: "May
I trouble you just a minute to hand me the files in this case?''
How too would those older Lee County lawyers play jokes on one
another; like boys almost. I can remember one occasion when John
Stevens, the writer's father, was compelled to go to Springfield
on a case pending before the Supreme Court. Edward Southwick was
of the party. Southwick was very dark. Southwick and Stevens
were partners at the time too, but when Mendota had been
reached, and the passengers had gone into the dining room for
dinner, Stevens whispered in the ear of the landlord that a
separate table should be provided for Southwick. No specific
reason was given more than to nod and make a remark about his
complexion. When Southwick attempted to take a chair with his
companions, the landlord took him by the arm and very gently
hinted that he had provided a separate table for his colored
guests. How the profanity did fly from Lawyer Southwick!
Perhaps I'd better not repeat the story
of the bet John Stevens made with E. B. Stiles at a banquet, to
the effect that he, Stevens, could eat Stiles' oysters. Nor had
I better tell the reason why he was able to win. I may say,
however, that Stevens won his bet and ate Stiles' oysters.
Even the good old circuit judges knew
how to laugh. Can any-one ever forget the trial of that same E.
B. Stiles for maintaining a nuisance in the form of a hog pen on
Third street, right in the midst of a dense population? For
reasons best known to himself, Stiles defended himself without
the assistance of counsel. He appeared armed with a very
exhaustive brief from which he quoted when he wished to
emphasize a point. That famous brief was written by that prince
of wits, Benjamin F. Shaw.
A man named Tooke, a nice old gentleman,
had the habit of asking for so many favors for his "Dixon
Seminary" that he had made himself tiresome to many. Stiles,
when he had reached a particularly strong point, affirmed his
flight of oratory by opening his brief with great dignity and
begging permission to refer to "Tooke on Bores. "
Did Judge Heaton fine the defendant for
contempt? Never I Like any other human being he laughed a good
old-fashioned laugh that nearly split his fat sides. Aaron L.
Porter, twice or thrice sheriff, once had an experience with a
wheelbarrow, and right under the observation of that same Judge
Heaton, and later in the trial when Stiles had a particularly
obstinate bit of law to overcome, he opened up his brief again
and asked the court to refer to "Porter on Barrows.'' Verily,
never did court or counsel or defendant present a day of such
delicious humor as the celebrated Stiles Hog Case, in which the
jury acquitted the defendant and at the same time presented him
with a purse of a dozen pennies with which to hire a lawyer for
the next offense.
From the very beginning of things, the
services of Lee County lawyers were sought to go great distances
to fight desperate cases. When the old Indian chief, Shabbona,
found himself helpless to combat the plots and counter plots of
Bogus Gates and his coterie of experts, it was Edward Southwick
whose services were sought by the old chief. And Southwick went
over to Shabbona's home in DeKalb County and cleaned out the
Gates crowd so effectually that no member of it ever dared annoy
Shabbona thereafter.
While William Smith, brother of the
Mormon prophet, resided in Lee County, he had been quick to
perceive the abilities of the lawyers of Lee County, so that
when Joseph and Hyrum Smith were thrown into the Carthage jail,
S. G. Patrick and Edward Southwick, were sent for, post-haste,
to defend them. Of course it is well known that the Smiths were
shot without a trial, and before Patrick and Southwick could
reach Carthage; but the point is illustrated when the fact has
been stated that Lee County lawyers were sought, when what might
have been the biggest case of the state 's history, was likely
to be tried.
For a time, I was unable to determine
who the first lawyer was to locate in Lee County. Until the
September term, 1842, when attorneys appeared for clients, the
clerk did not name them; but at that time, when a new penmanship
appeared on the records, the record writer began the custom of
writing his records thus: "And now comes the plaintiff by ______
, his attorney. "
Nevertheless, at the first term of the
circuit court, begun on the third Monday of April, 1840, quite
unintentionally perhaps, J found the name of Edward Southwick,
associated with W. W. Fuller, attorneys for the defendant
sheriff in the case of Charles H. Capman versus Aaron Wakelee,
I. N. Balestier was attorney for the plaintiff. The latter was a
Peoria lawyer. Fuller was an Oregon lawyer and Southwick was a
Dixon lawyer. This led me to believe Southwick was the first
lawyer. Just when he came to Dixon is unknown, but it must have
been about the year 1836, because he was admitted to the bar of
Illinois Nov. 25, 1836. Sub-sequent correspondence proves
incontestably that he was Lee County's first lawyer.
On Nov. 4, 1840, Edward Southwick
appeared in court, and on his motion, William W. Heaton was
admitted to practice, and so was Walter Merriman, who does not
seem to be known as a Lee County lawyer. This would make him the
second lawyer. Shepard G. Patrick was admitted to practice, on
the records of the clerk of the Supreme Court, March 29, 1842,
and the first time I found his name on the Lee County records,
was under date May 4, 1843, when as senior member of the firm
Patrick & Noble, he appeared in the Lee circuit court.
In the records for May 6, 1843, I find
the name of Cyrus Chamberlain, as master in chancery of Lee
County. If he was a lawyer he would come next to Southwick, but
no evidence exists that he ever practiced. Lorenzo Wood, who was
admitted in Michigan, came to Dixon in 1842. Although his name
always was included as a member of the bar, he never practiced.
The same may be said of Roberts, of Roberts and Mackay. On Sept.
11, 1843, I find also that Edward Southwick appeared in court
and on his motion, John V. Eustace was admitted to practice.
Southwick seems to have led in practice
from the beginning, his name appearing in four-fifths of all the
cases, as attorney for one side or the other. Other names, most
of them unfamiliar, are Edwin R. Mason, S. A. Mason, Chase (was
it George or Charles?), May, Kellogg, Fraser, Wallace, Evans,
Wells, states attorney. From the appearance of the dockets, one
must decide that litigation was common. I found one case whose
term number was 111.
But, to begin with, the first term of
court, held in the schoolhouse on the third Monday of April,
1840, was presided over by Judge Dan Stone, of Galena. He will
be remembered as the member of the Legislature, who with
Lincoln, signed what was designed to be a protest against a
slavery resolution, passed by the lower House. Aaron Wakelee,
was sheriff; Shelton L. Hall, circuit attorney and George W.
Chase, clerk. The grand and petit jurors, selected by the county
commissioners and mentioned in another place, with few
exceptions, appeared and were sworn in. Those of the grand jury
panel, who did not appear, were Noah Bedee, David H. Birdsall
and Peter T. Scott, and Judge Stone entered a rule on them to
show cause why they should not be fined for con-tempt. I cannot
find where they were fined, which makes it probable that they
purged themselves.
Lee was attached to the Sixth judicial
circuit Jan. 15, 1840, and the times for holding courts were
fixed for the third Mondays of April and September. The bonds of
George W. Chase, clerk, $2,000; Samuel Johnson, coroner, $2,000
and Aaron Wakelee, sheriff, $2,000, were brought into court and
approved.
There must have been at least forty-one
cases on the first docket, because one of that number, Charles
Franks vs. Thomas H. March, bill for injunction, was reached.
The first case on the docket was John M.
Kinzie, the famous Chicago man of the early days, vs. William
Wilkinson, appealed from Smith Gilbraith, a justice of the
peace. It seems that Kinzie appeared at neither trial and so he
was called in open court three times, and failing to appear, his
appeal was dismissed, and the judgment of the court below,
according to the practice of that day, was affirmed. A
procedendo was issued and the costs taxed, the first case in the
fee book, were $4.17½.
While the Kinzie case was first on the
docket, case number five (5) was the first case in which a
motion was made, at that term, entitled, William F. Bradshaw vs.
James Dacey and Daniel Carpenter. Defendants asked to have the
case dismissed, and the motion was overruled.
Seven indictments were returned by the
grand jury; the first was against Zachariah Phillips for keeping
a gaming house; the second was against the same party for
keeping a billiard table; the third was against Jude W.
Hamilton, for selling liquor without a license; the fifth was
against Caleb Tallmage (shades of Black-stone and Kent! It was
Deacon Tallmage!) for selling liquor without a license; sixth,
John and Joshua Cutshaw, for selling liquor without license, and
seventh against John B. Wilson, for forgery, counterfeiting and
passing counterfeit money.
Hamilton, with a man named Chapman, ran
a store in the original John Dixon house in 1836. Their
establishment was the first opened in Dixon. He is also reputed
to have built the first frame building in Dixon, a little affair
which sat close to the east wall of the brick building on the
alley, First Street, between Ottawa and Galena avenues, owned by
George Downing and occupied by the American Express Company and
another tenant.
Hamilton was found guilty and fined $10
and costs. Tallmage was found not guilty. The Cutshaws gave bond
for their appearance and then defaulted it.
At this term of court, the first
"first'' naturalization papers were issued to Nelson Thurston,
who declared his intention to become a citizen.
A special term was called for the first
Monday of November, 1840, at which the cases on the docket had
run up to at least one hundred and eleven.
Our old friend Frederick R. Dutcher, cut
considerable of a figure at this term of court. He and Smith
Gilbraith were the two justices of the peace, elected at the
first election held for the purpose and it seems he married a
couple without having a marriage license. The circumstance must
have cut a great figure in contemporaneous history, because he
was indicted three times at this term and once in May, 1843; but
he got away from it all after considerable litigation. A party
named Knowlton was his attorney. On Sept. 19, 1842, Michael
Fellows, our first recorder, first appears on record. He was
made deputy circuit clerk on that day by G. W. Chase, the clerk.
In 1856, James K. Edsall, who
subsequently became Attorney-General of the state, came to Dixon
from Kansas, where he had been a member of the Legislature.
In August, 1855, a directory printed in
a newspaper called the Daily Whisper, contained the following
list of Dixon lawyers: F. R. Danna, John Stevens, John V.
Eustace, Heaton and Atherton, J. D. Mackay, S. G. Patrick,
Frederick A. Soule and Edward Southwick. Lorenzo Wood should be
included, although he and Danna nor Soulé practiced actively.
Wood, however, in 1849, had his sign out in Dixon, as a lawyer.
In 1845, a correspondent writing for a
Rockford paper made the statement that there were six lawyers in
Dixon. They were so far as known Edward Southwick, S. G.
Patrick, Silas Noble, William W. Heaton, John V. Eustace and
Lorenzo Wood.
John V. Eustace later, in 1856, became a
member of the Legislature. He introduced a bill making a new
circuit, which was passed and he became judge of that circuit
from the ranks of Lee county attorneys. He served until 1861,
when Judge William W. Heaton was elected. When the law
establishing the appellate courts was passed, Judge Heaton was
appointed to the appellate bench and became the first presiding
judge for the first, Chicago, district. He died in 1878, while
in office and Judge John V. Eustace was elected to fill the
vacancy. Judge Eustace died in office and Judge John D. Crabtree
was elected to the office and very soon was elevated to the
appellate bench for the second district. He too died in office
and Judge Farrand was elected to the office which he has held
ever since. Thus it will be seen Lee County has furnished a
circuit judge ever since the year 1856, and an appellate court
judge for two of the districts of the state.
From the Lee County bar, Solomon Hicks
Bethea was made a judge of the United States district court, in
Chicago. Sherwood Dixon, S. H. Bethea, Charles B. Morrison and
William B. Sterling, all occupied the position of United States
district attorney, the first three for the northern district of
Illinois and the last named for the State of South Dakota.
William Barge too was one of the big
lawyers of Illinois. He enjoyed a very large practice and was
known the state over as a lawyer of great learning and power. To
come to the present bar of Lee County, it ranks as it always has
ranked. The present dean is Abram K. Trusdell, who has retired
from active work to enjoy a competency he has reserved from a
large and active practice. The firm name is Trusdell, Smith and
Leech. Mr. Clyde Smith has fought and won in the highest courts,
and that too, lately, some of the most important cases which
have come before them. Mr. William L. Leech, the junior partner,
resides in Amboy.
In the celebrated Miller case, Mr. Clyde
Smith won the distinction of securing in the laws of evidence, a
new rule, of such importance and potency that not only has it
been adopted as a leading case on "handwriting," but all text
books have incorporated it in their new editions. The law
schools to teach evidence of "hand-writing by comparison," from
the principles Mr. Smith established in the Miller case. This
case today enjoys as much fame as the celebrated "rule in
Shelley's case" enjoyed of old.
Hiram A. Brooks and Clarence C. Brooks,
as Brooks & Brooks, enjoy an extensive business. Mr. H. A.
Brooks is regarded as one of the strongest trial lawyers in
Illinois at this period. J. W. Watts, who is the head of the law
school, is most deeply learned in the law, and he is known far
and wide. The graduates from his law school occupy important
positions before the bar in half the states of the Union and
several others are upon the state and national benches. Still
others are today United States attorneys. Recently the alumni of
his school formed themselves into a society and many met in
Dixon to enjoy a banquet.
Henry S. Dixon and George C. Dixon, as
Dixon & Dixon, sons of Sherwood Dixon and great grandsons of
John Dixon, occupy prominent positions as lawyers. Their father
was recognized as one of the foremost lawyers of his time, and
they enjoy the heritage of that name as well as the support and
confidence of a large clientage, made up largely of big
corporations, like the Illinois Central and Northwestern steam
railroads and the local Intra Mural Surface railroad between
Dixon and Sterling, as well as our big Illinois Northern
Utilities Company. As successors of the firm Dixon (Sherwood) &
Bethea, Morrison & Bethea, and Morrison, Bethea & Dixon (H. S.),
Messrs. Dixon & Dixon came into a fine practice. One thing is
most remarkable about these firms; Sherwood Dixon, S. H. Bethea
and Charles B. Morrison, in the order named, were made United
States district attorneys for the northern district of Illinois,
from continuations of the same partnership. Edward H. Brewster
is in the enjoyment of a splendid practice. Associated with him
is his brother, Charles W. The former was states attorney and is
the legal adviser of the cement company, the biggest of its kind
in the country. When big corporations want good lawyers they
have been in the habit of selecting Dixon lawyers. For years Mr.
John E. Erwin has taken the position of a leading criminal
lawyer of Illinois. During the past year he has handled three of
the most noted criminal cases of the state. Two of them were
desperate. Probably for blood curdling atrocity, the Doctor
Webster case will rank first for long years to come and in each
case he not only got his men off with their lives, but in one
instance he secured the liberty of his client.
Lee County has been fortunate in its
public prosecutors, especially with Messrs. (Charles B.
Morrison, Edward H. Brewster, Charles H. Wooster and Harry
Edwards. These gentlemen made great reputations. Mr. Wooster
lives in Amboy and he enjoys one of the largest practices in the
county. George P. Goodwin was another of the old time big
lawyers of Lee County. When he became commissioner of the land
department for the Chicago and Northwestern railroad, he left
active practice. On his death, Judge Crabtree took the position,
but preferring active practice he returned to Dixon and later
was elected state Senator and then circuit judge.
James K. Edsall was elected state
Senator first and that office was made the stepping stone to the
more important one of Attorney-General which he held for two
terms. In that office he made a great name as a lawyer and in
the United States Supreme Court; records, his name will be found
associated with some of the noted Illinois litigation. While in
Dixon he was employed by the son of Lewis Clapp to fight the
will of that testator. Judge Eustace presided and he decided in
favor of Mr. Edsall 's contention to the effect that an executor
could not be endowed with the discretionary power given in this
will. Thus an estate of something like half a million dollars,
passed to the son instead of to the erection of an agricultural
college. Lewis Clapp, at his death, was the richest man in Lee
County.
For careful and very able effort in the
management of cases, Messrs. Wingert & Wingert have no superiors
before this or any' other bar. Their defense, last summer, of
Dr. S. M. Green, indicted for manslaughter, was generally
admitted to be one of the master-pieces of trial work. The jury
acquitted Doctor Green. But what-ever the case may be, common
law, chancery or criminal, they are the same clear, close and
able men and by the time the case has been digested, it is safe
to say not one solitary point has escaped their observation and
study. The statement that they are splendid lawyers will bear
repetition many times.
John P. Devine is walking rapidly to the
front as a lawyer of the first abilities. Last year he was
elected representative in the General Assembly and what is
unusual for a new member; he was placed upon the most important
committees in the House. To him Governor Dunne looked for
support in the many trying emergencies which arose and in not
one single instance did Mr. Devine err in judgment or waver in
his support of the Governor's efforts to pass reform bills. His
remarkable record has given him a commanding popularity and
influence in the state.
Albert H. Hanneken, one of the younger
members of the bar, has reached a strong position in a
marvelously short period. His practice already reaches the
volume that many of the old time practitioners never realized to
their very last days.
At one time in his career, a criminal
had been charged with the commission of an offence from which no
escape seemed possible. He had participated in the theft of a
valuable automobile. He had been caught red handed. In assigning
him counsel, it was assumed as a matter of course he would be
convicted and so would make a fit subject for one of the younger
lawyers to practice on.
Accordingly Mr. Hanneken was selected.
To everybody's astonishment he selected his jury with discretion
and a vim that indicated a fight of the first magnitude. Over a
day was consumed in the trial of the case and when the jury
returned their verdict, it acquitted Mr. Hanneken's client and
convicted the co-defendant. Other incidents at the same term
happened, just as important and to the average layman, just as
unusual. That ended abruptly, Mr. Hanneken's apprenticeship and
today he occupies a position which is impregnable.
City Attorney Mark C. Keller, by reason
of a long list of special assessment cases, and the successful
management of them, has won the reputation of being one of the
strongest lawyers of the bar. It is his privilege to boast that
he never has been beaten in one of his cases.
Mr. Grover W. Gehant is the youngest
member of the bar today. In most instances it is the experience
of young lawyers to wait long and patiently for business. Mr.
Gehant is a notable exception to this rule. In less than a
year's time he found himself engaged in some of the biggest
cases on the calendar. By reason of the long illness of Mr. A.
C. Bardwell, the master in chancery, in whose office Mr. Gehant
had become installed, it fell to his lot to unravel some of the
knottiest problems the chancery docket presented and he did it
in a masterful way. Net results: he was immersed in business
immediately.
I cannot overlook Arthur G. Harris, John
B. Crabtree and William H. Winn.
Our youngest lawyer is John J.
Armstrong; but he is the best developed youngster in this county
of Lee.
Judge Robert H. Scott, County judge,
never has sought active practice. He has contented himself with
his official duties.
Messrs. A. C. and Henry C. Warner enjoy
the largest probate practice in the circuit. The senior member
in his younger days was deputy county and circuit clerk and
deputy treasurer and it is not saying too much to pronounce him
the best probate lawyer in Northen Illinois.
And here is another phenomenon which the
Lee county bar presents. I may safely challenge any other county
to reproduce another such instance.
Down in the southeast township of this
county a little village of perhaps six hundred souls stands. It
is surrounded by a land virtually flowing in milk and honey. Its
people are wealthy, almost to the last person.
In that contented, law-abiding community
is stationed Charles P. Preston, the lawyer who enjoys the most
lucrative practice in Lee County. By sheer ability, honesty,
sobriety and industry, he has won this brilliant distinction and
I beg to assert that he has met for years, foemen worthy any
warrior's steel. Three counties, Lee, LaSalle and DeKalb, pay
tribute to him almost reverentially.
Purposely I have reserved this place for
one of the best loved men who ever lived in this community. The
first letter of his name is the first in the alphabet, and I
suppose I should have begun with him. As one of the very first
of our citizens, I suppose I should have selected his name as
number one. As a continuous resident of Dixon since 1854, how
may I excuse this delay? In delaying this little reference, I
may have shown wretched taste. But I am sure the reader will not
convict me.
Jason C. Ayres has been a member of the
Lee county bar for long years. He never has practiced actively,
because of the large interests which year after year have
engaged his attention other-wise.
Nevertheless, he never has permitted
himself to get beyond hailing distance from his brothers.
He is president of the Dixon National
Bank. He is a large real-estate holder. In the process of
building up his large fortune, others reposed such confidence in
him and his judgment that drafts for amounts almost unlimited,
drawn by Mr. Ayres, would have been honored at sight. Of such
men, the Lee County bar and the Lee County people are proud.
Thirty-seven years ago a couple of
youngsters from Lee county presented themselves before the
Supreme court for the bar examination. Their pulses ran high.
They passed. Both live in Lee County today. One lives in Amboy,
one in Dixon. The first is my very dear old friend, J. E. Lewis,
tried and true and generous; the dean of Amboy's lawyers. And
there too may be found Charles H-Wooster, P. M. James, Charles
E. Ives and William L. Leech, able, strong, and successful; the
two Charlies, boyhood friends as true as steel.
Numbers never made things better. Amboy
ranks second to Dixon numerically, but in Amboy will be found a
little city with as many loyal, royal people, man for man, as in
any community under the sun, and of those people, you will
pardon me if, with my lifetime of association with J. E. Lewis,
Charles H. Wooster and Charles E. Ives, members of the Lee
County bar, I am drawn a little closer towards them and reserve
for them a few more words, before I say good bye.
Attorneys of the Lee County Bar
Charles E. Ives
P. M. James
J. E. Lewis
William L. Leech
S. B. Pool
Charles H. Wooster Amboy;
Jason C. Ayres
A. C. Bardwell
E. H. Brewster
Charles W. Brewster
Hiram A. Brooks
C. C. Brooks
John B. Crabtree
Henry S. Dixon
George C. Dixon
John P. Devine
John E. Erwin
Harry Edwards
Grover W. Gehant
M. J. Gannon Jr. |
A. G. Harris
A. H. Hanneken
Mark C. Keller
A. W. Leland
Charles B. Morrison
J. F. Palmer
W. F. Preston
Clyde Smith
Robert H. Scott
J. O. Shaulis
Harvey Sindlinger
A. K. Trusdell
A. C. Warner
J. W. Watts
E. E. Wingert
William H. Winn
Henry C. Warner
Dixon; J. W. McHale
Charles F. Preston Paw Paw |
Lee County
History
This page is
part of a larger collection.
Access the full collection at
History of
Lee County Illinois
|