Review of Inlet Swamp, Lee County, Illinois
By A. C. Bardwell
In the eastern section of Lee county is
a large body of land known as ''Inlet Swamp" which until recent
years was not only of little worth, but seriously depreciated
the tracts that bordered it. The more depressed portions were
submerged in wet seasons, so that large areas were converted
into lakes and ponds. The prevailing growth in this part of the
tract was slough grass horse high, cattail, bull rushes and the
like. The land coining within this class had no market value. In
dry seasons the finer grades of slough grass were cut for hay,
but in wet seasons hunters enjoyed the only revenue. It is
difficult to estimate the acreage in the slough proper, but it
was probably not less than ten thousand acres.
A marvelous change has been wrought in
all this section by the organization of Inlet Swamp Drainage
District and the work it has been carrying on and has brought to
final completion this winter. The district was organized in the
county court of Lee county, the Hon. R. S. Farrand, judge
presiding, by an order entered Aug. 5, 1887, the petition there
for having been filed on the 10th day of the preceding November.
Much bitter opposition was aroused and every conceivable
obstacle interposed by a large element of the interested
landowners, who seemed to labor under the conviction that the
movement was destined to result in virtual confiscation of their
property. The feasibility and utility of the scheme was doubted
by many who believed that the cost of the work would greatly
overmatch the benefits to be derived, but HOW that the hopes of
the most sanguine have been realized, the work is generally
regarded as a great success. In view of developments, it seems
unaccountable now, that the undertaking should have met the
antagonism it did from the very landowners who have since reaped
rich benefits in yearly incomes from once unsalable property,
and in the consequent enhancement of values.
Though little has been said or known
about this work outside the immediate vicinity where it has been
going on, and aside from occasional articles in the Amboy
Journal and brief references to it in other papers and the
formal legal notices appearing as required, the press has been
silent regarding it; the fact is that no public work ever
carried forward in Lee county compares with it in magnitude of
wealth created or reclaimed. It has raised whole farms from the
mire, and converted an unsightly, pestilential swamp into a rich
agricultural district, where lands unsalable before are bringing
from sixty dollars to eighty dollars an acre.
It has added an average of nearly 40 per
cent to the assessable value of the lands within the district.
By towns the increase has been as follows:
Alto from $11,798 in 1886 to $14,722 in
1899
Bradford from 21,791 in 1886 to 34,010 in 1899
Lee Center from 26,219 in 1886 to 32,420 in 1899 Willow Creek
from 6,228 in 1886 to 6,402 in 1899 Viola from 59,177 in 1886 to
120,083 in 1899
Reynolds from. 28,556 in 1886 to 47,569 in 1899
$183,769 $255,206
The increase in actual market value, as
indicated by the price at which lands have been sold and are now
selling, is very much greater than these figures would indicate.
The process by which such beneficent
results have been accomplished may, therefore, be a matter of
public interest, and it is due to those who have encouraged and
supported the enterprise, as well as to the officers who have
borne the burdens of the task and surmounted its many
difficulties and discouragements, that the story of the task be
told.
The district embraces 30,079 acres, all
of which was formed by the court to need drainage, although much
was fair pasture and hay land in other than wet years. The four
main ditches or channels have a total length of thirty-two
miles, into which empty over seven and one-half miles of smaller
ditches and ''laterals.''
Preliminary to the order organizing the
district the court appointed E. C. Parsons, Wesley Steward and
John Nelles, commissioners to lay out the proposed ditches and
report plans, profiles and estimates, including the probable
cost of the work. They first called to their assistance the
county's old reliable engineer, William McMahon, Esq., but he
soon discovered that he could not go on with the work to the
end. Mr. A. E. Rutledge, a thoroughly-competent young engineer
of Rockford, took his place and Mr. McMahon contributed such
counsel as was needed. As far as weather would permit advantage
was taken of the frozen condition of the ponds the following
winter to make the surveys, and on April 21, 1887, the
commissioners submitted their report. The engineer estimated
that the proposed district drained a watershed of about one
hundred and fifteen thousand acres, and that the construction of
the ditches as located by his survey would require the removal
of 1,544,817 cubic yards of earth and 79,700 cubic yards of
stone. The commissioners reported that the work, including all
expenses of the district, would probably reach $185,000. When
the report came up for hearing the Protestants were numerous.
Every available lawyer in the county, and some from neighboring
counties, were enlisted and the court room was crowded with
indignant landowners from far and near, clamoring for protection
against what was characterized as a high-handed outrage on the
part of the commissioners.
After patient hearing the court ordered
the commissioners to estimate and report the probable cost of a
modified system, terminating the ''Main Ditch'' 2,600 feet below
the Birdsall bridge, instead of at the Badger dam, as
recommended by the commissioners, lessening the depth and width
of the rock cut at Inlet, generally contracting the size of the
ditches throughout the district and reducing the estimated
material to be removed to 640,000 cubic yards of earth and
10,400 cubic yards of stone. The commissioners reported the
probable cost of such work at $67,000. On the basis of this
report the court granted the order organizing the district, the
purpose being to construct the ditches according to the modified
system. Time has shown that the one first advanced by the
commissioners should have been followed, but public sentiment in
that as in most matters had to be educated up to the point of
wisdom. Drainage was then in its infancy and must needs slowly
win its way to public favor, as it has most triumphantly done.
The ditches, as at last constructed, conform substantially to
the lines and dimensions laid down by these first commissioners
and their young engineer.
The contract to do this first work was
let Feb. 15, 1888, in two portions, the larger to Pollard & Goff
who sublet it to McGillis & Company, the lesser to Gilbert F.
Henning.
A jury composed of William McMahon,
foreman, J. C. Howlett, James Kirby, John Fruit, John Holdren,
Abram Bennett, Jerome Bennett, John Nass, George Carey, G. A.
Lyman, E. W. Pomeroy and James King, was impaneled to spread the
assessment on the lands of the district for the required
$67,000. This work was done during the fall of 1887, and was
very thoroughly performed, every tract throughout the entire
district being inspected carefully by the jury in a body, the
work covering a period of nearly three months. The land in
tracts was classified in proportion to the benefits to be
received from the drainage, from 5 to 100; that is, those tracts
receiving the least benefit were marked 5, the next in order of
benefits 10, and so on, the tract receiving the greatest benefit
being marked 100. The $67,000 was then apportioned to each tract
from these figures according to the number of acres in a tract.
Work was begun and was pushed vigorously during the year 1888.
A year later, Feb. 15, 1889, the
commissioners made a report, based on the actual result of the
year's work, to the effect that the first assessment would fall
short of completing the ditches, and asking for a second
assessment. After due hearing at which the prior opposition was
renewed, the court ordered an assessment of $17,000 to finish
the work undertaken, and a jury to make the same was again
impaneled, composed of William McMahon, foreman, J. C. Howlett,
Jerome Bennett, A. J. Tompkins, Abram Bennett, John Holdren,
James Kirby, John Fruit, George Carey, John Nass, G. A. Lyman
and A. B. Fitch, and their labors were confirmed by the court
May 6, 1889. In the course of that sum-mer the ditches were
completed.
Aug. 3, 1891, the court ordered the
commissioners to extend an assessment of $2,800 for purposes of
repair, and their action was confirmed by the court Dec. 7,
1891.
As the season went by it became more and
more apparent to the commissioners and to the ardent friends of
the work, that the ditches were entirely inadequate to
thoroughly drain the swamp and give the owners of lands the
relief sought. The swamp was a vast basin of wet or soggy land,
dominated by ledges of rock at Inlet, the only place of escape.
The level of water was gauged by the lowest point in this
barrier. Below this the water saturating the soil could not
fall, excepting by evaporation, any more than a full barrel
could empty itself. As completed, the opening through the rock
was eighteen feet wide at bottom, and about five feet deep.
Through this aperture the floods of the rainy seasons were
compelled to pass, and it was impossible for the water to get
away quickly enough and lower the water level in the soil
sufficiently to render the wetter lands reliable for tillage.
This was evident to any unprejudiced person.
With the hope of remedying this radical
defect the commissioners petitioned the court, July 18, 1893,
for authority to widen the rock cut to the width of twenty-four
feet at bottom and to deepen it four or five feet, and to extend
the ''Main Ditch'' to the Badger dam to secure the necessary
fall. But at the hear-mg the opposition on the part of many of
the landowners was so stubborn that the court was compelled to
refuse the petition of the commissioners; and thus did the
contesting landowners once more accomplish the temporary defeat
of thorough drainage, and postpone the benefits ultimately to be
attained. It will be seen that at no time was it the fault of
the commissioners that the system stopped short of the highest
efficiency; but by a strange blindness to self-interest, and an
unaccountable disrespect of the law which prevents water from
running up hill, the contesting proprietors obstinately set
themselves against the necessary improvements. This was in 1893.
At this writing (December, 1900) an outlet of much greater
capacity than here proposed is carrying away the water of the
district.
Restive under the restraints and losses
inflicted by a policy so short-sighted, a number of owners of
lands in the district, residing in the central part of the state
where the value of drainage had been demonstrated, generously
offered to pay the expense of widening the rock cut. The
proposition was submitted to the court and the commissioners
were authorized to accept the proffer and do the work. The cut
was thus made twenty feet wider down to a line within a few feet
of the bottom at a cost to these people of $10,241.81, for which
they have received no reimbursements other than the benefits
resulting to their holdings in common with the rest of the lands
of the district. These non-resident landowners were represented
by Mr. E. F. Nichols of Delevan, Ill., whose intelligent
judgment and persistent labors in supporting the com-missioners
and promoting the interests of the district deserve to be here
recognized as well nigh invaluable.
In July, 1895, the commissioners
reported a shortage of funds needed to keep the ditches in good
condition; that trees were becoming rooted and bars were
forming. After due notice and hearing the court impaneled a jury
to levy a fourth assessment amounting to $9,000 on the lands of
the district, James Kirby, foreman, Abram Bennett, Warren Smith,
Dennis Bradshaw, John M. Sterling, F. E. Rogers, George Carey,
W. B. Merriman, Hi-ram Hetler, M. M. Avery, H. E. Chadwick and
W. W. Gilmore, comprised the jury. Their work was confirmed by
the court Nov. 4, 1895.
In 1897 the commissioners made a third
and successful effort to extend and enlarge the outlet and
increase the capacity of all the ditches to proportions adequate
to carry off the water as quickly as possible. Proper profiles,
plans and estimates were made and presented to the court with
their petition May 19, 1897. It was noticeable on the hearing of
this petition that the grounds of opposition had shifted. The
ditches had been for years arguing the cause of drainage, and
their logic had compelled recognition. Now the question did not
turn on the advisability of greater capacity and swifter flow,
but on the adjustment of the tax among the different owners.
On the hearing of this petition the
court found ''that it is necessary that the ditches of the
district be widened, extended and deepened, as hereinafter
ordered, in order to secure the proper drainage of the lands of
the district;'' and that ''the probable cost of said work,
together with charges and expenses necessarily incident thereto
will be fifty-five thousand dollars.'' Accordingly the court
ordered the commissioners, June 7, 1897, to extend an assessment
of that amount on the lands of the district for the purpose of
lowering the cut through the rock four to five feet and widening
it to the width of thirty feet and extending the ''Main Ditch"
to a point 100 feet below the Kreiter dam and lowering
correspondingly the North Ditch, Fourth Ditch, Middle Ditch and
South Ditch, as well as certain laterals. This work has now been
completed; and thus has been vindicated, by both court and
public sentiment, after a long and often disheartening struggle,
the policy recommended by the first commissioners and their
engineer and advocated by their successors. The loss caused by
its belated victory has fallen on the property owners.
This fifth assessment made by the
commissioners was confirmed by the court Sept. 13, 1897, and on
the 16th day of the same month the contract for the work was let
to John W. Boyer of North Manchester, Ind. Mr. Boyer's
prosecution of the work was so dilatory and unsatisfactory that
the commissioners rescinded their contract with him and relet
the job to Mr. John E. Burke of Chicago at the same figures.
Notwithstanding the many unexpected difficulties encountered by
reason, principally, of unfavorable weather, he hung manfully to
his task and fulfilled his con-tract to the letter, except in
the date of completion, which was extended as the necessities of
the situation required. Mr. Burke's work showed him to be a
thoroughly reliable contractor.
But the money raised by the fifth
assessment proved insufficient to finish the job and the
commissioners were forced to petition the court for a sixth
assessment. After due hearing, at which many landowners
appeared, the court ordered that $15,000 more be raised to
complete the work and repair the ditches. This order was entered
Jan. 13, 1900, and a jury to extend the assessment was
impaneled, consisting of James Kirby, foreman, Jesse Cole, Hiram
Hetler, Edward Lamb, Abram Bennett, E. L. Thorp, F. L. Childs,
F. E. Rogers, Frank Messer, George W. Smith, William V. Jones
and B. F. Lane, whose assessment was confirmed by the court July
6, 1900.
The ditches of the system being now
finally completed it only remains to maintain them in such
condition as will render them most serviceable. The assessments
aggregate $165,800, and this plus the contribution mentioned
must be set down as the cost of ditches to date, less such
portion of the last assessment as will be left for repair
purposes.
The work done under the contract with
Pollard & Goff was at the rate of ten to twelve cents (according
to locality) per cubic yard for earth, fifty-five cents for
stone and thirty-five cents for hardpan. The rate under the
contract with Henning was nine and one-half to twelve cents
(according to locality) per cubic yard for earth, twenty-five
cents for stone and hardpan; but the Pollard & Goff contract
embraced all the rock and hardpan work. Under all the contracts
with Boyer and Burke the price was ten cents per cubic yard for
earth, fifty-five cents for stone and forty cents for hardpan.
The three contracts were let to the lowest bidder and were
considered to be very favorable to the district. In each
instance there was sharp competition among contractors seeking
the job.
The assessments were made payable in
installments. The last installment of the several assessments
fall due as follows: Of the first in 1902; of the second in
1895; of the third in 1896; of the fourth in 1900; of the fifth
in 1912; of the sixth in 1905. Of the first assessment $21,000
of the principal has been paid, $12,000 of principal will be
paid this year (1900), $15,000 in 1901, and the balance,
$19,000, in 1902. The second and third assessments have been
fully paid. The last installment ($630) of the fourth assess-ment
will be paid this year. The sixth assessment is payable in three
installments, of $5,000 each, in 1903, 1904 and 1905. The fifth
assessment is divided into nine installments, payable each year
commencing in 1906 and ending in 1912. The policy of the court
in so adjusting the several assessments was to postpone the
heavier payments until such time as the owners would be
receiving the benefits of the work. The amount due this year,
including interest, is substantially the same as last. Next year
if will be $1,600 more and in 1902 the climax will be reached,
the amount then falling due with interest being $20,140. After
that the burden, exclusive of interest, which will lessen with
every payment, will average about $7,000 a year (not taking into
account payments made in advance), or about 25 per cent more
than the rate of 1897. The assessments all draw interest at the
rate of 6 per cent per annum.
Inasmuch as the payment of the
assessments was postponed, and it was necessary to have funds
available to pay contractors and meet the general expenses of
the district, the court directed the commissioners to borrow
money on the bonds of the district, payable out of the several
assessments when collected, except the last. Of this last
assessment $8,945.39 has already been paid by the landowners and
they have received their releases from further liability on
account of the sixth assessment.
Six series of bonds have been issued,
all bearing interest at 6 per cent per annum, but all except the
first issue of $6,000 were sold at such a premium as in effect
reduced the interest much below this rate.
The tax on the lands of the district if
distributed equally would be approximately five dollars and
fifty cents per acre, but as the constant effort has been to
adjust the load according to benefits, many tracts are charged
with much more and many much less than this. The record shows
that the largest total assessment paid by any one is ten dollars
and forty cents per acre.
The work of the civil engineers who laid
out the ditches and supervised their construction has been from
the first extremely satisfactory. Mr. G. H. T. Shaw of Dixon
succeeded Mr. Rutledge, and by his ability and fairness has
added to a well earned reputation in both respects.
Josiah Little, the old-time and always
reliable banker of Amboy was early appointed treasurer of the
district and still securely holds the purse, the details of the
office being discharged by his efficient cashier, Mr. F. N.
Vaughan.
The district has been fortunate in its
comparative immunity from litigation. Portentous clouds gathered
in the early days, and various mutterings such as the lawyers of
the county combined were capable of, disturbed the air, but in
due time the clouds drifted away, the threatenings subsided, and
calm prevailed. One landowner appealed from the assessment of
damages awarded him. The contest ended with the verdict of a
jury in the county court
The failure of Glann & McDonald,
subcontractors under Boyer, to comply with the terms of the
contract, and their abandonment of the job leaving workmen and
material, men unpaid, forced the commissioners again into court.
Something over $2,000 was due Boyer on final settlement. Glann &
McDonald insisted that the money should be paid to them, and the
people whom they owed also contended for it; while Boyer, who
was disposed to pay the men, but refused to pay the defaulting
subcontractors, demanded the money. Under this sort of
cross-fire the commissioners were compelled to bring an
interpleader suit in the circuit court whereby the rights of the
contestants should be deter-mined. Glann & McDonald, claiming to
be non-residents, removed the case to the United States Court in
Chicago, where it is still pending.
In extending the ditches beyond the
original boundaries of the district as required by the court's
order of Jan. 7, 1897, it was necessary to condemn the right of
way or acquire it by purchase. Not being able to come to an
agreement with the owner of the Badger dam, the destruction of
which was necessary, a jury was called to assess the damage.
Only one other contest has been experienced. Indeed it was the
only genuine lawsuit in the history of the district, and was
occasioned by the erection of a temporary dam at Inlet to
produce backwater sufficient to float the dredges. A portion of
the farm of Austin Willis was overflowed and he sued the
commissioners personally as well as in their official capacity
for damages. He recovered in the circuit court, but the
appellate court reversed the judgment and dismissed the suit. A.
C. Bardwell, of Dixon, has been the attorney for the district
from the first. The organization was effected, all assessments
were made and all bonds were issued under his direction, and he
has had charge of whatever litigation has occurred. It may be
fairly said that he has always faithfully seconded the
commissioners in their policy of patience and conciliation, by
which the district has been safely steered through and beyond
the shoals of complicating litigation which frequently
threatened it.
But credit for the successful
development of Inlet Swamp Drainage District is chiefly due to
the court and the commissioners, a court that had faith in the
possibilities of drainage and at the same time proper regard for
the views of the land-owners and commissioners who were
steadfast in their purpose to accomplish the thorough drainage
of the lands of the district. It, doubtless, would have been
much more economical if the required funds had been raised in
one or two assessments instead of six, and greatly to the
benefit of the proprietors if the work as first proposed could
have all been done under the first contract; but conditions
which could not be ignored demanded a slower, though more
expensive process.
As already noted the first commissioners
(the ones who may be justly said to have laid the foundations of
the work) were E. C. Parsons of Dixon, Wesley Steward of Steward
and John Nelles of Viola. On the organization of the district
the court appointed William S. Frost of Bradford, Henry B. Cobb
of Viola and Wesley Steward, their successors. Frost was made
president and Steward Secretary. The board as thus constituted
continued without changes until Sept. 12, 1899, when Xavier F.
Gehant was appointed in Mr. Steward's place, and succeeded him
as secretary. They have all accounted to the county court for
every dollar of the funds expended by them, and every
expenditure, item by item, will be found spread upon the records
of the court, where he may read who cares. That these several
commissioners should each be some-what proud of their part in
the work as finally consummated is not strange. No better nor
more enduring monument marks the faithful services of public
officers in Lee County.
In 1901 the 30,000 acres comprising and
bordering the old Inlet Swamp will take their place among the
most productive and valuable agricultural districts in the
county to which they belong. The only solicitude now yo be
indulged is that a network of drainage on which so much has been
expended may not be properly cared for. If not kept clear of the
industrious and prolific willow, and if bars are allowed to
form, its service will rapidly decline and the lands will suffer
accordingly. It is to be hoped that in maintaining the ditches
up to the highest state of usefulness the commissioners will
receive the active cooperation of all persons interested
therein.
Inlet
Swamp
Lee County
History
This page is
part of a larger collection.
Access the full collection at
History of
Lee County Illinois
|